HIN (SWINE) flu & vaccinations PART 1


As a Nanny I am particularly concerned with the recent panic in the mass media over the HIN so-called ‘Swine’ flu. In an attempt to create a balanced view I have posted information from a number of sources.

To begin however, think on this.

“… children are being given around 25 vaccinations and combinations by the age of two …”

VACCINATION MANUFACTURERS: Baxter International, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline

Executives from drug giants Baxter International, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline sat on the World Health Organization’s vaccine advisory board that recommended mass vaccinations in July.

Baxter, whose executives sit as “observers” on a key WHO board that recommended mandatory vaccinations against the “swine flu” for the world, is reporting a huge increase in profits this year.Baxter’s net income totaled $1.1 billion, an increase of 13 percent for the first six months of 2009, according to a report from July 16th.The boost in earnings comes as the company reaps the fruits of government contracts for “swine flu” vaccinations that Baxter itself recommended to those same governments through the vehicle of WHO, underlining fears that Baxter, Novartis and GSK among others have formed a tight oligopoly that dominates not only the markets but also key agents in international and national government bodies.SOURCE: http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2009/08/01/baxters-profits-soar-pn-the-back-of-the-forced-mass-vaccinations-against-the-swine-flu-it-recommended-to-who/



Will new pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccines be safe?

Licensed vaccines, including influenza vaccines, are held to a very high standard of safety. Likewise, all possible precautions will be taken to ensure safety of new pandemic vaccines and results from clinical trials, currently ongoing or soon to be initiated, will be taken into consideration by the regulatory authorities in their decision to license pandemic vaccines. In early June, WHO held a consultation of experts which reviewed the safety of adjuvants, or substances added to vaccines to make them more effective; no significant safety concerns were identified. Vaccine safety will be carefully monitored through post-marketing surveillance.

How can a repeat of the 1976 swine flu vaccine complications (Guillain-Barré syndrome) experienced in the United States of America be avoided?

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an acute disorder of the nervous system. It sometimes develops following a variety of infections, including influenza. Studies suggest that seasonal influenza vaccines could sometimes be associated with an increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome on the order of one to two cases per million vaccinated persons. During the 1976 influenza vaccination campaign, about 10 persons per million vaccinated persons developed GBS which stopped the vaccination campaign and led to the withdrawal of the vaccine. The reason why GBS developed in association with that specific vaccine has never been firmly established. The potential for the development of a similar risk with future vaccines can never be firmly excluded. However, the influenza A (H1N1) vaccine will be manufactured according to established standards and post marketing surveillance will be conducted to monitor potential development of any serious adverse events following administration of vaccine. Safety monitoring systems are an integral part of strategies for the implementation of the new pandemic influenza vaccines.

Who will approve (license) new influenza A (H1N1) vaccines for use?

Regulatory approval for new influenza A (H1N1) vaccines will be conducted by national authorities. National regulatory authorities have put into place expedited processes that do not compromise on the quality and safety of the vaccine. SOURCE: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/vaccine_preparedness/safety_approval/en/index.html



(CBS) State officials told the federal government Wednesday how much vaccine they’ll need to combat H1N1. Some of the first doses should go to pregnant women, who are 1 percent of the population but account for 6 percent of H1N1 deaths – 28 so far.

But not all pregnant women are eager to get the vaccine, reports CBS News Correspondent Dr. Jennifer Ashton.

Erin Mahoney thinks she’s lucky – not brave – to be one of approximately 100 pregnant women around the country testing the new swine flu vaccine.

“I saw no reason to be nervous about getting the vaccine now,” Mahoney said.

CBS News.com Special Report: H1N1

But many pregnant women are nervous about whether this new vaccine, which was produced and tested so quickly, is really safe. Only one in six pregnant women even get a regular flu shot.

“It’s a difficult nut to crack, the pregnant population is resistant,” said Dr. Iffath Hoskins, chair of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at Lutheran Medical Center.

Clinical trials on the vaccine have found no safety problems so far. But when the vaccine is given to millions, the government doesn’t want people to jump to conclusions about any complications that may occur. Some 2,400 miscarriages occur every day, so health officials caution people should not assume they were caused by the vaccine.

“Some medical events will happen in the days following the vaccination. The question is, are they related?” said Dr. William Schaffner of Vanderbilt University.

SOURCE: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/30/eveningnews/main5354121.shtml


WHO’s affiliated US lab, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is intensitying its efforts to persuade pregnant women to take the untested swine flu jab with a Goebbels-style propaganda sheet calledWhat Should Pregnant Women Know About 2009 H1N1 Flu (Swine Flu)?

The key fact that pregnant women should know — namely that the swine flu jab has not been tested on any pregnant women ever and that it contains mercury responsible for autism as well as dangerous adjuvants that are illegal in the USA and UK — is not mentioned in the CDC “advice” sheet.

This “advice” appears to have only one purpose: to so alter and misrepresent the facts that people are ready to take a jab classified as a bioweapon that they would never ever take if they had access to the accurate information such as it is the CDC’s duty to supply.